In addition to the three contractual comparisons, the OCR announced last month that it had concluded five comparisons on patient access to its own health records. Last week, we wrote about five hipa locations as part of the Right of Access Initiative. These fines ranged from $3,500 to $70,000, and HIPAA`s offences specifically related to not allowing patients access to their own protected health information (PHI). On September 15, 2020, HHS announced that it had completed five investigations under the HIPAA Right of Access initiative, following on from previous activities. HipAA Right of Access Initiative aims to support the right of individuals to access their medical records at a reasonable cost and within a reasonable time frame. According to Roger Severino, Director of the OCR, “People cannot make their health decisions without having access to their own medical information in a timely manner.” It should be noted that all establishments were relatively small (by far the highest $ 70,000), as were most of the suppliers involved. However, this underscores the OCR`s efforts to “send a message” about compliance with HIPAA rules, including the right of access. Between September 21 and 25, the OCR announced three much larger locations, between $1.5 million and $6.85 million. These studies showed that a broader range of HIPAA requirements had been met. In the announcements for all three cases, the OCR described “systemic non-compliance.” In other words, they all ignored the important responsibilities of HIPAA or only did the minimum. If anyone doubts about the application of HIPAA, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which oversees HIPAA compliance, has made it clear over the past two weeks that they are serious. In its recent announcements of resolution and monetary settlement agreements, OCR has provided examples among eight companies and counterparties of all kinds and sizes.

Summary: The NFB and a blind student who recently graduated from Mesa Community College was a complaint against discrimination against students and other blind students. The complaint states that the third-party websites and software applications used for course work did not work with screen-reading software and that clicks were not accessible to blind students. In the colony, MCCD agreed to take a series of measures leading to the acquisition and use of electronics and information technologies, accessible to all students, including the blind. The specific technologies covered by the regime are consistent with the technologies covered by the OCR resolutions, including Penn State University and the University of Montana (both are above). Last week, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services`s (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) continued its recent trend of early announcement of transaction agreements. With two other colonies announced in the rapid episode, the total number to 10 last month and 13 for the year, rapidly increase 2020 the list for years with the largest number of colonies. It should be noted that more than half of the implementations were carried out this year under the HIPAA Right of Access initiative (initiative), most of which have relatively small suppliers.

The initiative was tacitly announced by the OCR in 2019 (see our previous article here) and has since appeared to be a priority for the implementation of the OCR. The last two comparisons under the initiative and key compliance obligations will be reviewed below. Well-organized hacker groups have targetedly participated in institutions in the health and health sectors in order to gain access to sensitive data.